Model comparison
Hy4 preview vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 55.7 to 36.3.
Side by side
| Hy4 preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 45.3 | 37.9 |
| Released | 2026-08-28 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 64K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.83 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy4 preview leads
Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1632 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1291 |
Reasoning Hy4 preview leads
Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 68.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1272 |
Math Hy4 preview leads
Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 75% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1295 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1242 |
| LMArena French | — | 1260 |
| LMArena German | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1289 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1247 |
Long Context Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1272 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hy4 preview better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?
Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hy4 preview or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?
Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.