Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Google

37.8

Rank #194 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 51.9 to 34.1.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifications
Gemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderGoogleXiaomi
Noometry Index37.848.5
Released2025-02-052026-09-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked3219

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Coding13221504
LMArena WebDev—1637
SciCode—51.3%
LiveBench Coding47.1%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts13241482
CritPt—12%
LiveBench Reasoning50.1%—
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis65.5%—
ForecastBench57.1—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Math13091468
ProofBench—63%
Omni-MATH37.4%—
LiveBench Math58.1%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Expert13051501
MMLU-Pro72%—
GPQA (HELM)50%—

Multimodal MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision11001259

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Non-English13231434
LMArena Chinese13391511
LMArena French13471475
LMArena Russian13281409
LMArena Spanish13131456
LMArena German1306—
LMArena Japanese1301—
LMArena Korean1325—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following13051463
LiveBench Instruction Following78.3%—
IFEval82.4%—

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Longer Query13201463

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text13301455
LMArena Creative Writing13191400
LMArena Multi-Turn13071451
WildBench79%—
LiveBench Language34.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper