Model comparison
Inkling vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Inkling leads 55.1 to 35.7.
Side by side
| Inkling | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Thinking Machines Lab | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 44.1 | 37.9 |
| Released | 2026-07-15 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 66K | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.87 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4.68 | — |
| Results tracked | 41 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Inkling: 34.5 (#234), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Inkling | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1464 | 1291 |
| FrontierCode | 14% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1413 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 4.1% | — |
| SciCode | 47% | — |
| WeirdML | 32.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 946 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Inkling: 29.6 (#85), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | Inkling | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 33.8% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 25% | — |
Reasoning Inkling leads
Inkling: 40.4 (#56), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)
| Benchmark | Inkling | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1451 | 1272 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 36.5% | — |
| SimpleBench | 50% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 79.5% | — |
| CritPt | 5.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | — |
| DTBench | 87.5% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 148.54 | — |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Inkling: 31.3 (#225), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)
| Benchmark | Inkling | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1479 | 1305 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 33.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 4.9% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
Knowledge Inkling leads
Inkling: 55.1 (#49), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | Inkling | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1465 | 1295 |
| GPQA Diamond | 88.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 40.3% | — |
Multilingual Inkling leads
Inkling: 54.0 (#52), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)
| Benchmark | Inkling | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1490 | 1242 |
| LMArena French | 1458 | 1260 |
| LMArena German | 1446 | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | 1429 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1448 | 1289 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1429 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1404 | — |
Instruction Following Inkling leads
Inkling: 75.1 (#71), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)
| Benchmark | Inkling | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | 1247 |
Long Context Inkling leads
Inkling: 43.8 (#86), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)
| Benchmark | Inkling | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1434 | 1272 |
Writing & Preference Inkling leads
Inkling: 65.2 (#51), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)
| Benchmark | Inkling | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1441 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1387 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | 1252 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1611 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1226 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Inkling better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?
Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Inkling or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 34.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Inkling and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling has 41 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.