Model comparison
Mercury vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Mercury scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 36.5 to 17.5.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mercury | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 48.5 |
| Released | — | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Mercury: 38.7 (#170), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)
| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1504 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1637 |
| SciCode | — | 51.3% |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Mercury: 17.5 (#293), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)
| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1285 | 1482 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 21.6% | — |
| CritPt | — | 12% |
Math Not comparable
Mercury: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)
| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 63% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1468 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mercury: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)
| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1501 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Mercury: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)
| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1259 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Mercury: 41.6 (#206), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)
| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1260 | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1511 |
| LMArena French | — | 1475 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1409 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1456 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Mercury: 65.2 (#224), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)
| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | 1463 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Mercury: 38.4 (#198), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)
| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1266 | 1463 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Mercury: 46.2 (#221), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)
| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1282 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1191 | 1400 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1282 | 1451 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mercury better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Mercury or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Mercury and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.