Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Mistral Nemo
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 3.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.5-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Mistral Nemo in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.3 to 28.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 84.5% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro and 48.6% for Mistral Nemo.
- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Mistral Nemo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 45.2 | 26.4 |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | 2024-07-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 128K |
| Max output | 131K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1479 | — |
| SciCode | 50.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1503 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 899.8 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —, Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130), Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 84.5% | 48.6% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 34.4% | — |
| CritPt | 4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1488 | — |
| LMCA | 29.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.68 |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |
Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96), Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 22% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1481 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98), Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 29.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1503 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1449 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | — |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1458 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1437 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1471 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1477 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1483 | — |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49), Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1493 | 881 |
| LMArena Text | 1465 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1208 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro better than Mistral Nemo?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 3.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.5-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Mistral Nemo?
Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Mistral Nemo share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.