Model comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Mistral Nemo

Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.9 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 23× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 2.5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Google

44.9

Rank #67 Confirmed

Mistral Nemo Mistral AI

25.9

Rank #332 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher in 5 categories and Mistral Nemo in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 55.8 to 12.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 95.9% for Gemini 2.5 Pro and 10.8% for Mistral Nemo.
  • Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $10 for Gemini 2.5 Pro.
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
  • Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.5 Pro and Mistral Nemo specifications
Gemini 2.5 ProMistral Nemo
ProviderGoogleMistral AI
Noometry Index44.925.9
Released2025-03-252024-07-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M128K
Max output66K128K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$0.15
Output $ / M tokens$10$0.15
Results tracked7810

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.8 (#86), Mistral Nemo: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral Nemo
SWE-bench Verified57.6%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)53.6%—
Aider Polyglot83.1%—
LMArena WebDev1227—
SciCode42.8%—
GSO3.9%—
WeirdML54%—
LiveBench Coding85.9%—
LMArena Coding1452—
CadEval64%—
ALE-Bench785.52—
AlgoTune1.51—

Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 2.5 Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.1 (#81), Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral Nemo
BALROG43.3%17.6%
Terminal-Bench32.6%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—27.6%
GDPval23.3%—
Remote Labor Index0.8%—
TheAgentCompany30.3%—
τ²-bench Banking13.7%—
DeepResearch Bench42.8%—
LMArena Search1142—
METR Time Horizons55.4%—
Vending-Bench 2573.64—

Reasoning Gemini 2.5 Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#85), Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral Nemo
DTBench82.4%48.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index145.32118.63
ARC-AGI-24.9%—
SimpleBench62.4%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark70.3%—
ARC-AGI-141%—
CritPt2%—
Chess Puzzles20%—
EnigmaEval5.6%—
LiveBench Reasoning89.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1455—
LiveBench Data Analysis79.9%—
LMCA34.8%—
ForecastBench61.3—
LiveBench82.3%—
PIQA—83.5%

Math Gemini 2.5 Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 31.9 (#191), Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral Nemo
MATH Level 595.9%10.8%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)24.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 40%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202584.7%—
Omni-MATH41.6%—
LiveBench Math90.2%—
LMArena Math1450—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)14.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—
GSM8K—84.2%

Knowledge Gemini 2.5 Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.8 (#41), Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral Nemo
GPQA Diamond85.3%29.9%
Humanity's Last Exam21.6%—
MMLU-Pro86.3%—
Confabulations10.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7%—
GPQA (HELM)74.9%—
LMArena Expert1452—
BoolQ—82.5%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 44.5 (#16), Mistral Nemo: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral Nemo
LMArena Vision1263—
GeoBench86%—
VPCT48%—
LMArena Document1421—
SpatialViz-Bench44.7%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.5 (#30), Mistral Nemo: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral Nemo
LMArena Non-English1452—
LMArena Chinese1507—
LMArena French1473—
LMArena German1487—
LMArena Japanese1462—
LMArena Korean1435—
LMArena Russian1460—
LMArena Spanish1473—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.2 (#71), Mistral Nemo: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral Nemo
LiveBench Instruction Following80.6%—
IFEval84%—
LMArena Instruction Following1436—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.7 (#5), Mistral Nemo: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral Nemo
Fiction.LiveBench91.7%—
LMArena Longer Query1449—

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.9 (#60), Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral Nemo
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1421881
LMArena Text1458—
LMArena Creative Writing1453—
Short-Story Creative Writing83.8%—
WildBench85.7%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1453—
LiveBench Language67.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Pro better than Mistral Nemo?

Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.9 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 23× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 2.5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Mistral Nemo?

Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Gemini 2.5 Pro lists at $1.25 and $10.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Pro and Mistral Nemo share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper