Model comparison

MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Ministral 3B

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 5.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.5-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi

45.2

Rank #74 Confirmed

Ministral 3B Mistral AI

26.2

Rank #338 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Ministral 3B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 42.2 to 10.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 84.5% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro and 51.7% for Ministral 3B.
  • Ministral 3B is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.10 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Ministral 3B specifications
MiMo-V2.5-ProMinistral 3B
ProviderXiaomiMistral AI
Noometry Index45.226.2
Released2026-04-222024-10-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M131K
Max output131K262K
Input $ / M tokens$0.43$0.10
Output $ / M tokens$0.87$0.10
Results tracked276

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60), Ministral 3B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMinistral 3B
LMArena WebDev1479—
SciCode50.2%—
LMArena Coding1503—
ALE-Bench899.8—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130), Ministral 3B: 18.4 (#282)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMinistral 3B
DTBench84.5%51.7%
LMCA29.5%5.5%
NYT Connections (extended)34.4%—
CritPt4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1488—
Epoch Capabilities Index—118.1

Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96), Ministral 3B: 26.6 (#258)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMinistral 3B
ProofBench22%—
LMArena Math1481—
MATH Level 5—14.4%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98), Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#302)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMinistral 3B
GPQA Diamond—25.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.3%
LMArena Expert1503—

Multilingual Not comparable

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34), Ministral 3B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMinistral 3B
LMArena Non-English1449—
LMArena Chinese1507—
LMArena French1488—
LMArena German1458—
LMArena Japanese1412—
LMArena Korean1437—
LMArena Russian1450—
LMArena Spanish1471—

Instruction Following Not comparable

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21), Ministral 3B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMinistral 3B
LMArena Instruction Following1477—

Long Context Not comparable

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37), Ministral 3B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMinistral 3B
LMArena Longer Query1483—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49), Ministral 3B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProMinistral 3B
LMArena Text1465—
LMArena Creative Writing1440—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1493—
EQ-Bench 41208—
LMArena Multi-Turn1477—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro better than Ministral 3B?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 5.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.5-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Ministral 3B?

Ministral 3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Ministral 3B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 3B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper