Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Qwen Turbo
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 6.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.5-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 40.0 to 15.3.
- Qwen Turbo is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 45.2 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1479 | — |
| SciCode | 50.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1503 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 899.8 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 34.4% | — |
| CritPt | 4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1488 | — |
| DTBench | 84.5% | — |
| LMCA | 29.5% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| ProofBench | 22% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1481 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1503 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1449 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | — |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1458 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1437 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1471 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1477 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1483 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1465 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1493 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1208 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro better than Qwen Turbo?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 6.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.5-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Qwen Turbo?
Qwen Turbo is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.