Model comparison
Hy4 preview vs Mistral Nemo
Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 7.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 55.7 to 25.5.
- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $2.25 for Hy4 preview.
- Hy4 preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| Hy4 preview | Mistral Nemo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 45.3 | 26.4 |
| Released | 2026-08-28 | 2024-07-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 128K |
| Max output | 64K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.75 | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.25 | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1632 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |
Reasoning Hy4 preview leads
Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79), Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 68.2% | — |
| DTBench | — | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.68 |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |
Math Hy4 preview leads
Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42), Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 75% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 29.9% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hy4 preview better than Mistral Nemo?
Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 7.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Hy4 preview or Mistral Nemo?
Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview lists at $0.75 and $2.25.
Which has the bigger context window?
Hy4 preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and Mistral Nemo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.