Model comparison
Magistral Small vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 25.9 to 6.8.
Side by side
| Magistral Small | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 30.2 | 38.7 |
| Released | 2025-06-10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 40K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 35.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1319 |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 6.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 5% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1302 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.19 | — |
Math Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 30% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1316 |
Knowledge Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 56.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1273 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Magistral Small: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1300 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1254 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Magistral Small: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |
Long Context Not comparable
Magistral Small: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Magistral Small: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1290 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Magistral Small better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Magistral Small or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (38.4 vs 38.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Magistral Small and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Small has 10 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.