Model comparison
Olmo 3 32b Think vs Olmo 7b Instruct
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 49.1 to 25.8.
Side by side
| Olmo 3 32b Think | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 38.7 | 30.3 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1016 |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1302 | 993 |
Math Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1316 | 1018 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1273 | — |
Multilingual Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1255 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1300 | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | 1254 | 947 |
| LMArena French | 1291 | — |
| LMArena German | 1290 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1275 | 978 |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1296 | — |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1300 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1256 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1290 | 1007 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 3 32b Think better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 3 32b Think or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 3 32b Think and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3 32b Think has 14 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.