Model comparison
Magistral Small vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 25.9 to 6.8.
- Magistral Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Magistral Small | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.2 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2025-06-10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 40K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 35.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1314 |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 6.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 5% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1299 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.19 | — |
Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 30% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1298 |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 56.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1289 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Magistral Small: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1314 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1271 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Magistral Small: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |
Long Context Not comparable
Magistral Small: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Magistral Small: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Magistral Small better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Magistral Small or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (38.4 vs 38.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Magistral Small and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Small has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.