Model comparison
Amazon Nova Micro vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Micro scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 67.2 to 56.3.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Micro | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 30.4 | 38.7 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 10K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.035 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Results tracked | 32 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 30.5 (#295), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 1319 |
| LiveBench Coding | 20.2% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Micro: 22.1 (#132), Olmo 3 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 22.3% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 17.4 (#294), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1191 | 1302 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 25.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 34% | — |
| LiveBench | 29.6% | — |
Math Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 26.9 (#254), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1206 | 1316 |
| Omni-MATH | 21.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 34.5% | — |
Knowledge Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 29.6 (#237), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1184 | 1273 |
| MMLU-Pro | 51.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
| MMLU | 70.8% | — |
Multilingual Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#239), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1186 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1209 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1238 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1192 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1185 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1154 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1150 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1225 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 56.3 (#272), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1174 | 1275 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 48% | — |
| IFEval | 76% | — |
Long Context Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#229), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1205 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 39.5 (#247), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1208 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1172 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1178 | 1290 |
| WildBench | 74.3% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 15.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Micro better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Micro or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Micro and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Micro has 32 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.