Model comparison
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Magistral Small
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.0 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 24.5 to 6.9.
- Magistral Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Magistral Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 38.0 | 29.9 |
| Released | — | 2025-06-10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 40K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177), Magistral Small: 37.8 (#172)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 35.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1307 | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147), Magistral Small: 6.9 (#345)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 6.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1286 | — |
| DTBench | — | 61.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 133.19 |
Math Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178), Magistral Small: 24.9 (#253)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30% |
| LMArena Math | 1281 | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188), Magistral Small: 30.9 (#215)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1276 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1346 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1266 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1277 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1342 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1284 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Magistral Small?
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.0 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Magistral Small better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.6 vs 37.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Magistral Small share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Small has 10.