Model comparison
Llama 3.2 90B vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 36.5 to 11.1.
Side by side
| Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 27.5 | 38.7 |
| Released | 2024-09-24 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1319 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80), Olmo 3 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1302 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | — |
Math Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1316 |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |
Knowledge Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1273 |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124), Olmo 3 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1300 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1254 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1290 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.