Model comparison
Olmo 3 32b Think vs Yi-34B
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 35.0 to 7.5.
Side by side
| Olmo 3 32b Think | Yi-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 38.7 | 27.8 |
| Released | — | 2023-11-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1112 |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1302 | 1104 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 71.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 117.39 |
Math Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1316 | 1114 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 5.1% |
| GSM8K | — | 76% |
Knowledge Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1273 | 1061 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 14.7% |
| MMLU | — | 76.3% |
Multilingual Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1255 | 1079 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1300 | 1176 |
| LMArena French | 1291 | 1081 |
| LMArena German | 1290 | 1042 |
| LMArena Russian | 1254 | 1050 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 993 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 959 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1070 |
Instruction Following Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1275 | 1091 |
Long Context Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1296 | 1094 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1300 | 1129 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1256 | 1108 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1290 | 1113 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 3 32b Think better than Yi-34B?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 3 32b Think or Yi-34B better for coding?
Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 3 32b Think and Yi-34B share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3 32b Think has 14 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.