Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 36.5 to 9.3.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 38.7 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1319 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1302 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |
Math Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1316 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1273 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1275 |
Long Context Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1290 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.