Model comparison
Llama 3.2 90B vs Qwen3.6 Flash
Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 90B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 39.0 to 11.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 2.6% for Llama 3.2 90B and 84.4% for Qwen3.6 Flash.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.5 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2024-09-24 | 2026-04-27 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.19 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.13 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ALE-Bench | — | 326.4 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217), Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | 143.26 |
| SimpleBench | — | 35.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 77.1% |
| LMCA | — | 31% |
Math Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308), Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | 84.4% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274), Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Qwen3.6 Flash?
Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Qwen3.6 Flash share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.