Model comparison
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Llama 3.2 90B
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 35.8 to 11.1.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.2 90B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 27.5 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1307 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1286 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.5 |
Math Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178), Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1281 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |
Knowledge Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41% |
| LMArena Expert | 1276 | — |
| MMLU | — | 80.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1346 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1266 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1277 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1341 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1284 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Llama 3.2 90B?
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Llama 3.2 90B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.