Model comparison
Laguna M.1 vs MiMo-V2-Flash
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
PoolsideSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Laguna M.1 scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2-Flash in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 35.6 to 20.3.
Side by side
| Laguna M.1 | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 40.8 |
| Released | 2026-04-28 | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | 33K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Laguna M.1: 36.4 (#195), MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1348 | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1443 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Laguna M.1: 21.9 (#187), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.1 (#155)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1420 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Laguna M.1: 20.3 (#276), MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.6 (#141)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1396 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.1 (#126)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1425 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.1 (#109)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1391 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1463 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1324 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1392 |
Long Context Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#106)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1409 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.9 (#101)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1404 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Laguna M.1 better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Laguna M.1 or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (36.4 vs 35.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 262K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.