Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Laguna M.1

Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.1 Anthropic

40.8

Rank #136 Confirmed

Laguna M.1 Poolside

31.9

Rank #252 Reported

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.1 scores higher in 3 categories and Laguna M.1 in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Opus 4.1 leads 31.6 to 21.9.
  • Laguna M.1 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 200K.
  • Laguna M.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Opus 4.1Laguna M.1
ProviderAnthropicPoolside
Noometry Index40.831.9
Released2025-08-052026-04-28
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K262K
Max output32K33K
Input $ / M tokens$15—
Output $ / M tokens$75—
Results tracked483

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 44.3 (#69), Laguna M.1: 36.4 (#195)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Laguna M.1
LMArena WebDev13901348
SWE-bench Verified73.3%—
WeirdML45.9%—
LMArena Coding1479—
ALE-Bench674.77—
AlgoTune1.34—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.1: 34.8 (#38), Laguna M.1: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Laguna M.1
Terminal-Bench38%—
GDPval43.6%—
Cybench42%—
DeepResearch Bench48.3%—
LMArena Search1148—
METR Time Horizons66.8%—

Reasoning Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 31.6 (#70), Laguna M.1: 21.9 (#187)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Laguna M.1
SimpleBench60%—
Chess Puzzles7%—
EnigmaEval7.2%—
EBR-Bench7.9%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1443—
Mystery Game Puzzles21%—
DTBench80%—
LMCA37.1%—
Surface Evolver Bench—15.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index144.11—
ForecastBench62—

Math Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 22.0 (#267), Laguna M.1: 20.3 (#276)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Laguna M.1
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)12.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 42.4%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202568.9%—
ProofBench—0%
LMArena Math1430—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)7.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.1: 41.9 (#93), Laguna M.1: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Laguna M.1
GPQA Diamond77.3%—
Humanity's Last Exam11.5%—
Confabulations17.1%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate11.8%—
LMArena Expert1439—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.1: 26.2 (#114), Laguna M.1: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Laguna M.1
VPCT35%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.1: 52.1 (#90), Laguna M.1: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Laguna M.1
LMArena Non-English1405—
LMArena Chinese1427—
LMArena French1432—
LMArena German1412—
LMArena Japanese1378—
LMArena Korean1381—
LMArena Russian1421—
LMArena Spanish1448—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.1: 75.8 (#53), Laguna M.1: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Laguna M.1
LMArena Instruction Following1436—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.1: 44.5 (#60), Laguna M.1: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Laguna M.1
LMArena Longer Query1455—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.1: 62.6 (#70), Laguna M.1: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Laguna M.1
LMArena Text1419—
LMArena Creative Writing1412—
Short-Story Creative Writing84.7%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1444—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than Laguna M.1?

Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Opus 4.1 or Laguna M.1 better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Laguna M.1 does, with 262K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.1 and Laguna M.1 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.1 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Laguna M.1 has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper