Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs MiMo-V2-Flash
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 24.9 to 12.3.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2024-02-15 | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 45 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 34.2 (#241), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1294 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | — |
| CadEval | 34% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.9 (#145), MiMo-V2-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 3.4% | — |
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |
| BALROG | 21% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#338), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1296 | 1420 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 27.1% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| DTBench | 59% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 89.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 25.8 (#266), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1315 | 1396 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 23.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 36.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 70.4% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.4 (#239), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | 1425 |
| GPQA Diamond | 57.2% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.4% | — |
| MMLU | 86.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.8 (#77), MiMo-V2-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1161 | — |
| Video-MME | 75% | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.3 (#174), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1312 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | 1462 |
| LMArena French | 1302 | 1429 |
| LMArena German | 1286 | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1292 | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1320 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1311 | 1420 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.6 (#185), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1392 |
| IFEval | 83.7% | — |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.8 (#169), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | 1409 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.4 (#172), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1296 | 1404 |
| WildBench | 81.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.