Model comparison
Grok 4.1 vs Laguna M.1
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
PoolsideSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Grok 4.1 scores higher in 2 categories and Laguna M.1 in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.1 leads 38.9 to 21.1.
- Laguna M.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4.1 | Laguna M.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Poolside |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 32.5 |
| Released | 2025-11-17 | 2026-04-28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Laguna M.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253), Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1214 | 1349 |
| LMArena Coding | 1445 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 39% | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91), Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1435 | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
Math Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120), Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 0% |
| LMArena Math | 1422 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1417 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1425 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | — |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena German | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1397 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1438 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1437 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.1 better than Laguna M.1?
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.1 or Laguna M.1 better for coding?
Laguna M.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 33.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and Laguna M.1 share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Laguna M.1 has 3.