Noometry

Model comparison

Command R+ vs MiMo-V2-Flash

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.4

Rank #257 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi

41.3

Rank #138 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 43.5.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Command R+MiMo-V2-Flash
ProviderCohereXiaomi
Noometry Index32.441.3
Released2024-08-302025-12-16
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K262K
Max output4K66K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$10$0.28
Results tracked3421

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Command R+: 29.1 (#309), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Coding11871443
LMArena WebDev—1330
SciCode—25.9%
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%—
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%—
ALE-Bench—737.95
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+63.5%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Command R+: 9.2 (#344), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts11861420
SimpleBench17.4%—
CritPt—0%
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
DTBench54.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LMCA5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.34—
LiveBench31.8%—

Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Command R+: 28.9 (#242), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Math11881396
LiveBench Math21.3%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Command R+: 36.4 (#169), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Expert11741425
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%—
MMLU69.4%—

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Command R+: 38.6 (#227), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Non-English12161392
LMArena Chinese12261462
LMArena French12091429
LMArena German12161395
LMArena Japanese11661325
LMArena Korean11381358
LMArena Russian12271387
LMArena Spanish11891420

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Command R+: 60.0 (#254), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following11971392
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—

Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Command R+: 37.3 (#219), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Longer Query12301409

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Command R+: 43.5 (#228), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Text12291411
LMArena Creative Writing12351375
LMArena Multi-Turn12131404
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command R+ or MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command R+ or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Flash does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper