Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.5 to 49.1.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 38.7 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1319 |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1302 |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1316 |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1273 |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1300 |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | 1254 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1275 |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1290 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.