Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.7 to 49.5.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 38.1 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 37.9 (#171)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1389 | 1314 |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 24.8 (#139)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1299 |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 33.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1298 |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 34.9 (#179)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1289 |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 42.1 (#196)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1424 | 1314 |
| LMArena Russian | 1384 | 1271 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Korean | 1403 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.4 (#194)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | 1275 |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#180)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.5 (#186)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.