Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Qwen3.6 Flash

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

42.5

Rank #114 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

38.8

Rank #182 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 42.1 to 38.8.

Side by side

Hunyuan T1 20250711Qwen3.6 Flash
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index42.538.8
Released—2026-04-27
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.19
Output $ / M tokens—$1.13
Results tracked1313

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Coding1390—
ALE-Bench—326.4

Reasoning Too close to call

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen3.6 Flash
SimpleBench—35.2%
Chess Puzzles—20%
LMArena Hard Prompts1399—
Mystery Game Puzzles—18%
DTBench—77.1%
LMCA—31%
Epoch Capabilities Index—143.26

Math Too close to call

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen3.6 Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—22.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—84.4%
LMArena Math1414—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—10.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Qwen3.6 Flash leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen3.6 Flash
GPQA Diamond—83.3%
SimpleQA Verified—15.9%
LMArena Expert1395—

Multilingual Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Non-English1395—
LMArena Chinese1425—
LMArena Korean1406—
LMArena Russian1385—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following1374—

Long Context Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1384—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Text1401—
LMArena Creative Writing1392—
LMArena Multi-Turn1393—

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Qwen3.6 Flash?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Qwen3.6 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper