Model comparison

Nemotron 3 Ultra vs Olmo 3 32b Think

Nemotron 3 Ultra is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 3 Ultra NVIDIA

42.5

Rank #113 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 3 Ultra scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Nemotron 3 Ultra leads 52.5 to 35.0.

Side by side

Nemotron 3 Ultra and Olmo 3 32b Think specifications
Nemotron 3 UltraOlmo 3 32b Think
ProviderNVIDIAAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index42.538.7
Released2026-06-04—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.60—
Output $ / M tokens$2.40—
Results tracked3014

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 38.1 (#182), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Coding14681319
FrontierCode13.6%—
SciCode40.3%—
WeirdML43.5%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 23.4 (#126), Olmo 3 32b Think: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraOlmo 3 32b Think
APEX-Agents22.7%—

Reasoning Nemotron 3 Ultra leads

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 31.0 (#82), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Hard Prompts14521302
CritPt3.1%—
Chess Puzzles12%—
Mystery Game Puzzles20%—
DTBench90.1%—
LMCA36.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.17—

Math Olmo 3 32b Think leads

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 35.3 (#187), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Math14571316
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202586.7%—
ProofBench2%—

Knowledge Nemotron 3 Ultra leads

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 52.5 (#61), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Expert14721273
GPQA Diamond85.4%—

Multilingual Nemotron 3 Ultra leads

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 53.5 (#64), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Non-English14271255
LMArena Chinese14971300
LMArena French14721291
LMArena German14711290
LMArena Russian14171254
LMArena Korean1386—
LMArena Spanish1454—

Instruction Following Nemotron 3 Ultra leads

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 74.7 (#88), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Instruction Following14181275

Long Context Nemotron 3 Ultra leads

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 43.9 (#81), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Longer Query14371296

Writing & Preference Nemotron 3 Ultra leads

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 66.3 (#36), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Text14451300
LMArena Creative Writing13981256
LMArena Multi-Turn14111290
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1692—

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 3 Ultra better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Nemotron 3 Ultra is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Nemotron 3 Ultra or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (38.1 vs 38.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3 Ultra and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3 Ultra has 30 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper