Model comparison
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.5 to 48.7.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 42.5 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1307 | 1390 |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1286 | 1399 |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1281 | 1414 |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1276 | 1395 |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1346 | 1425 |
| LMArena Russian | 1266 | 1385 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1406 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1277 | 1374 |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1341 | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1288 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1284 | 1393 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 38.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.