Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs o4-mini
Hunyuan T1 20250711 and o4-mini score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.5 vs 41.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 3 categories and o4-mini in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.5 to 54.0.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | o4-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 41.6 |
| Released | — | 2025-04-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $4.40 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 60 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), o4-mini: 40.9 (#127)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1368 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 45% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 72% |
| GSO | — | 3.6% |
| WeirdML | — | 52.6% |
| CadEval | — | 62% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 826.17 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.72 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, o4-mini: 32.6 (#61)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 53.2% |
| GDPval | — | 25.3% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 63.9% |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), o4-mini: 24.6 (#162)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1351 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 6.1% |
| SimpleBench | — | 38.7% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 67.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 58.7% |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 26% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 9.2% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 77.6% |
| LMCA | — | 26.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 145.64 |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.8 |
Math o4-mini leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), o4-mini: 40.8 (#89)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1389 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 36.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 4.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 81.7% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 72% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.8% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 24.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 6.3% |
Knowledge o4-mini leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), o4-mini: 43.6 (#91)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1343 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 79.6% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 18.1% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 19.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 82% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 18.6% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 73.5% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, o4-mini: 40.2 (#49)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1194 |
| GeoBench | — | 64% |
| VPCT | — | 57.5% |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), o4-mini: 47.0 (#154)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1337 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1354 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1312 |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | 1334 |
| LMArena French | — | 1364 |
| LMArena German | — | 1336 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1308 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1347 |
Instruction Following o4-mini leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), o4-mini: 75.2 (#68)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1321 |
| IFEval | — | 92.8% |
Long Context o4-mini leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), o4-mini: 45.5 (#33)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1315 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 77.8% |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), o4-mini: 54.0 (#152)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1353 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1294 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1350 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 75% |
| WildBench | — | 85.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than o4-mini?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 and o4-mini score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.5 vs 41.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or o4-mini better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (40.9 vs 40.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and o4-mini share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and o4-mini has 60.