Model comparison
Granite 4.2 30b vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Granite 4.2 30b and Hunyuan T1 20250711 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.8 vs 42.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 2 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 5 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.5 to 53.8.
- Granite 4.2 30b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Granite 4.2 30b | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 42.5 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 11 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1396 | 1390 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1399 |
Math Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1414 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1406 | 1395 |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1414 | 1425 |
| LMArena Russian | 1343 | 1385 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1406 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | 1374 |
Long Context Too close to call
Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1359 | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1361 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1393 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Granite 4.2 30b and Hunyuan T1 20250711 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.8 vs 42.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Granite 4.2 30b or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (41.0 vs 40.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.