OpenAI, proprietary
o4-mini
o4-mini by OpenAI ranks 132nd of 354 ranked models on the Noometry Index as of October 2026, with a score of 41.6. Its strongest category is long context, where it ranks 33rd. API pricing starts at $1.10 per million input tokens and $4.40 per million output tokens, with a 200K-token context window.
Last verified
Specifications
- Noometry rank
- #132 of 354
- Index score
- 41.6
- Evidence
- Confirmed 60 results
- Provider
- OpenAI
- Released
- April 16, 2025
- Weights
- Proprietary
- Reasoning
- Yes
- Context window
- 200K
- Max output
- 100K
- Input price
- $1.10 / M
- Output price
- $4.40 / M
- Blended price
- $1.93 / M
- Output speed
- 6 tokens/s Kagi
- Value
- #150 of 219
- Knowledge cutoff
- May 2024
- Input
- text, image
Category scores
Each category score combines every public result we have in that category.
- Coding 40.9
- Agentic & Tool Use 32.6
- Reasoning 24.6
- Math 40.8
- Knowledge 43.6
- Multimodal 40.2
- Multilingual 47.0
- Instruction Following 75.2
- Long Context 45.5
- Writing & Preference 54.0
| Category | Score | Rank | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 40.9 | #127 | 6 |
| Agentic & Tool Use | 32.6 | #61 | 2 |
| Reasoning | 24.6 | #162 | 11 |
| Math | 40.8 | #89 | 6 |
| Knowledge | 43.6 | #91 | 8 |
| Multimodal | 40.2 | #49 | 3 |
| Multilingual | 47.0 | #154 | 1 |
| Instruction Following | 75.2 | #68 | 2 |
| Long Context | 45.5 | #33 | 2 |
| Writing & Preference | 54.0 | #152 | 5 |
Strengths and weaknesses
Categories where o4-mini places highest and lowest among the models ranked in each, with its score against that category's median.
Strongest categories
| Category | Score | vs median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Long Context | 45.5 | +4.6 | #33 of 296, top 12% |
| Instruction Following | 75.2 | +3.9 | #68 of 305, top 23% |
| Math | 40.8 | +4.3 | #89 of 327, top 28% |
Weakest categories
| Category | Score | vs median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multilingual | 47.0 | −0.4 | #154 of 297, top 52% |
| Writing & Preference | 54.0 | +0.2 | #152 of 312, top 49% |
| Reasoning | 24.6 | +0.9 | #162 of 350, top 47% |
Closest competitors
The models ranked just above and below o4-mini. When scores are this close, price and speed are often the better way to choose.
| Model | Rank | Score | Blended $/M | Speed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5 Mini | #128 | 41.8 | $0.69 | 3 | Compare |
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | #129 | 41.8 | — | — | Compare |
| Granite 4.2 30b | #130 | 41.8 | — | — | Compare |
| Muse Glimmer | #131 | 41.7 | — | — | Compare |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | #133 | 41.5 | $0.85 | — | Compare |
| Grok 4.1 | #134 | 41.5 | — | — | Compare |
| GLM-4.6 | #135 | 41.4 | $1 | 12 | Compare |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | #136 | 41.4 | $0.28 | — | Compare |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Benchmark results
Every published result we track, with its source. Bold rows are the ones used for ranking; where several exist we prefer independent runs over self-reported numbers.
Coding
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 45% | #29 of 39, top 75% | SWE-bench | 2025-07-26 | |
| Aider Polyglot | 72% | #8 of 44, top 19% | high | Epoch AI | |
| GSO | 3.6% | #28 of 31, top 91% | high | Epoch AI | |
| WeirdML | 52.6% | #43 of 119, top 37% | high | Epoch AI | |
| LMArena Coding | 1368 | #158 of 294, top 54% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| CadEval | 62% | #3 of 14, top 22% | medium | Epoch AI | |
| ALE-Bench | 826.17 | #54 of 105, top 52% | high | Epoch AI | |
| AlgoTune | 1.72 | #6 of 18, top 34% | high | Epoch AI |
Agentic & Tool Use
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 53.2% | #16 of 49, top 33% | fc | Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | |
| GDPval | 25.3% | #8 of 11, top 73% | high | Epoch AI | |
| METR Time Horizons | 63.9% | #16 of 32, top 50% | medium | Epoch AI |
Reasoning
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 6.1% | #52 of 83, top 63% | high | Epoch AI | |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.7% | low | Epoch AI | ||
| ARC-AGI-2 | 2.4% | medium | Epoch AI | ||
| SimpleBench | 38.7% | #55 of 77, top 72% | high | Epoch AI | |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 67.6% | #28 of 99, top 29% | Kagi LLM Benchmark | ||
| ARC-AGI-1 | 58.7% | #52 of 83, top 63% | high | Epoch AI | |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 21.3% | low | Epoch AI | ||
| ARC-AGI-1 | 41.8% | medium | Epoch AI | ||
| CritPt | 0.6% | #88 of 134, top 66% | high | Epoch AI | |
| Chess Puzzles | 26% | #41 of 129, top 32% | high | Epoch AI | 2025-12-08 |
| Chess Puzzles | 14% | low | Epoch AI | 2026-07-11 | |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | medium | Epoch AI | 2026-08-07 | |
| EnigmaEval | 9.2% | #15 of 38, top 40% | high | Epoch AI | |
| EnigmaEval | 6.8% | medium | Epoch AI | ||
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1351 | #159 of 297, top 54% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 5% | #71 of 74, top 96% | high | Epoch AI | 2026-08-27 |
| DTBench | 77.6% | #80 of 151, top 53% | high | Epoch AI | |
| LMCA | 26.5% | #83 of 125, top 67% | high | Epoch AI | |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.64 | #80 of 213, top 38% | Epoch AI | 2025-04-16 | |
| ForecastBench | 61.8 | #6 of 72, top 9% | Epoch AI |
Math
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 36.1% | #55 of 81, top 68% | high | Epoch AI | 2026-06-11 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 16.1% | low | Epoch AI | 2026-08-27 | |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 28.8% | medium | Epoch AI | 2026-08-27 | |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 4.9% | #56 of 63, top 89% | high | Epoch AI | 2026-06-11 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 81.7% | #78 of 173, top 46% | high | Epoch AI | 2025-04-16 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | low | Epoch AI | 2026-07-13 | |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 73.3% | medium | Epoch AI | 2026-08-07 | |
| Omni-MATH | 72% | #2 of 57, top 4% | HELM Capabilities | ||
| LMArena Math | 1389 | #139 of 285, top 49% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| MATH Level 5 | 97.8% | #3 of 79, top 4% | high | Epoch AI | 2025-04-16 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 24.8% | #25 of 68, top 37% | high | Epoch AI | 2025-11-13 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 10.7% | low | Epoch AI | 2025-11-16 | |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 19% | medium | Epoch AI | 2025-11-13 | |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 6.3% | #25 of 55, top 46% | high | Epoch AI | 2025-07-01 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | medium | Epoch AI | 2025-08-07 |
Knowledge
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 79.6% | #81 of 186, top 44% | high | Epoch AI | 2025-04-16 |
| GPQA Diamond | 75.3% | low | Epoch AI | 2026-07-11 | |
| GPQA Diamond | 77.8% | medium | Epoch AI | 2026-08-07 | |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 18.1% | #20 of 41, top 49% | high | Epoch AI | |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 14.3% | medium | Epoch AI | ||
| SimpleQA Verified | 18.8% | high | Epoch AI | 2026-08-27 | |
| SimpleQA Verified | 19.6% | #66 of 77, top 86% | low | Epoch AI | 2026-08-27 |
| MMLU-Pro | 82% | #12 of 58, top 21% | HELM Capabilities | ||
| Confabulations (lower is better) | 15.8% | #22 of 51, top 44% | high reasoning | Lech Mazur benchmarks | |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate (lower is better) | 18.6% | #89 of 96, top 93% | Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard | ||
| Vectara Hallucination Rate (lower is better) | 18.6% | #89 of 96, top 93% | Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard | ||
| GPQA (HELM) | 73.5% | #6 of 57, top 11% | HELM Capabilities | ||
| LMArena Expert | 1343 | #157 of 273, top 58% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Multimodal
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1194 | #82 of 122, top 68% | LMArena | 2026-10-09 | |
| GeoBench | 64% | #15 of 25, top 60% | high | Epoch AI | |
| GeoBench | 64% | medium | Epoch AI | ||
| VPCT | 57.5% | #6 of 24, top 25% | medium | Epoch AI |
Multilingual
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1337 | #154 of 297, top 52% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Chinese | 1354 | #166 of 285, top 59% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena French | 1364 | #139 of 223, top 63% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena German | 1336 | #141 of 231, top 62% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Japanese | 1308 | #118 of 211, top 56% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Korean | 1312 | #124 of 213, top 59% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Russian | 1334 | #156 of 283, top 56% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | #147 of 226, top 66% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Instruction Following
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 92.8% | #5 of 57, top 9% | HELM Capabilities | ||
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1321 | #162 of 298, top 55% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Long Context
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 77.8% | #13 of 47, top 28% | medium | Epoch AI | |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1315 | #176 of 291, top 61% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Writing & Preference
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1353 | #156 of 297, top 53% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1294 | #170 of 295, top 58% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 75% | #25 of 39, top 65% | medium | Epoch AI | |
| WildBench | 85.4% | #11 of 57, top 20% | HELM Capabilities | ||
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | #154 of 295, top 53% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
API pricing by provider
| Route | Input $/M | Output $/M | Cached input $/M | Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| azure | $1.10 | $4.40 | $0.28 | 2026-10-10 |
| openai | $1.10 | $4.40 | $0.28 | 2026-10-10 |
| openrouter | $1.10 | $4.40 | $0.28 | 2026-10-10 |
Compare o4-mini
- o4-mini vs o3-mini
- o4-mini vs Muse Glimmer
- o4-mini vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
- o4-mini vs Granite 4.2 30b
- o4-mini vs Grok 4.1
- o4-mini vs ERNIE 5.0 0110
- o4-mini vs GLM-4.6
- o4-mini vs Claude Fable 5.1
- o4-mini vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
- o4-mini vs Kimi K3
- o4-mini vs Grok 4.6
- o4-mini vs Qwen3.8 Max
- o4-mini vs GLM-5.3
- o4-mini vs Muse Spark 1.3
Other OpenAI models
- GPT-6 Astra70.8
- GPT-6.1 Sol65.6
- GPT-5.6 Sol65.0
- GPT-5.5 Pro64.3
- GPT-5.563.4
- GPT-6 Sol61.8
- GPT-5.459.4
- GPT-5.6 Terra59.2
Frequently asked questions
How good is o4-mini?
o4-mini by OpenAI ranks 132nd of 354 ranked models on the Noometry Index as of October 2026, with a score of 41.6. Its strongest category is long context, where it ranks 33rd. API pricing starts at $1.10 per million input tokens and $4.40 per million output tokens, with a 200K-token context window.
How much does o4-mini cost?
o4-mini costs $1.10 per million input tokens and $4.40 per million output tokens on OpenAI's own API, with cached input at $0.28.
What is o4-mini's context window?
o4-mini accepts up to 200K tokens of input and can write up to 100K tokens in one response.
Is o4-mini open source?
No. o4-mini is proprietary and available only through OpenAI's API and partner platforms.
How fast is o4-mini?
o4-mini generated about 6 output tokens per second in the Kagi LLM Benchmark's timed runs. Speed varies by provider, load and reasoning effort.
What are o4-mini's strengths and weaknesses?
Relative to other ranked models, o4-mini places best in long context, instruction following, math and lowest in multilingual, writing & preference, reasoning.
What is o4-mini best at?
Its best category is long context, where it ranks 33rd on Noometry.