Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Muse Glimmer
Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Muse Glimmer score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.5 vs 41.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 6 categories and Muse Glimmer in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 41.7 |
| Released | — | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1416 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1396 |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
Math Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1417 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1386 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | 1390 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1375 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1382 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1399 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Muse Glimmer?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Muse Glimmer score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.5 vs 41.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (40.9 vs 40.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Muse Glimmer share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.