Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Hunyuan T1 20250711 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.5 vs 42.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 6 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 38.7 to 25.9.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 42.5 |
| Released | 2026-07-21 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 39 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | 1390 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | — |
| SciCode | 41.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | 1399 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |
| DTBench | 83.5% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.13 | — |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1433 | 1414 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 13% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | 1395 |
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1268 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | 1385 |
| LMArena French | 1451 | — |
| LMArena German | 1454 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1374 |
Long Context Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1420 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1393 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Hunyuan T1 20250711 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.5 vs 42.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.