Model comparison
Muse Glimmer vs Qwen3.5-Flash
Muse Glimmer and Qwen3.5-Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.7 vs 42.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.5-Flash in 5 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.5-Flash leads 33.7 to 25.7.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.7 | 42.5 |
| Released | 2026-08-10 | 2026-02-23 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Results tracked | 15 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142), Qwen3.5-Flash: 34.2 (#242)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | 1244 |
| LMArena Coding | 1416 | 1412 |
| SciCode | 44.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 221.8 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: —, Qwen3.5-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 462.69 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5-Flash leads
Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144), Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.7 (#72)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | 1403 |
| CritPt | 2.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 20% |
| DTBench | — | 82.9% |
| LMCA | — | 29.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.98 |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125), Qwen3.5-Flash: 37.4 (#158)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1417 | 1407 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 6.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Qwen3.5-Flash leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143), Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#93)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | 1407 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 20.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.5% |
Multilingual Too close to call
Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122), Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.5 (#121)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | 1446 |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | 1379 |
| LMArena French | — | 1412 |
| LMArena German | — | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1368 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1344 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1400 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135), Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.6 (#139)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | 1374 |
Long Context Too close to call
Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129), Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#124)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1382 | 1392 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126), Qwen3.5-Flash: 57.9 (#122)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1339 | 1343 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1399 | 1393 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Glimmer better than Qwen3.5-Flash?
Muse Glimmer and Qwen3.5-Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.7 vs 42.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Muse Glimmer or Qwen3.5-Flash better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Qwen3.5-Flash share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-Flash has 32.