Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Hunyuan T1 20250711 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.8 vs 42.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 28.5 to 17.0.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 42.5 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1390 |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1399 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
Math Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1414 |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1428 | 1395 |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1249 | — |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1385 |
| LMArena French | 1467 | — |
| LMArena German | 1460 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1382 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1374 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1384 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | 1393 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Hunyuan T1 20250711 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.8 vs 42.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.