Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 66.8 to 47.2.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 50.3 |
| Released | — | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1534 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1629 |
| SciCode | — | 60.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | 1512 |
| CritPt | — | 26.6% |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1494 |
| ProofBench | — | 70% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1543 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | 1480 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1493 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | 1501 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1464 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.