Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 66.8 to 46.2.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 50.3 | 37.9 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1534 | 1291 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1629 | — |
| SciCode | 60.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,158 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 59.5% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1512 | 1272 |
| CritPt | 26.6% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1494 | 1305 |
| ProofBench | 70% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1543 | 1295 |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1529 | 1242 |
| LMArena Russian | 1480 | 1193 |
| LMArena French | — | 1260 |
| LMArena German | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1289 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1493 | 1247 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1501 | 1272 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1492 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1468 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1464 | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.