Noometry

Xiaomi, open weights

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi ranks 49th of 354 ranked models on the Noometry Index as of October 2026, with a score of 50.3. Its strongest category is instruction following, where it ranks 12th. API pricing starts at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens, with a 1.05M-token context window.

Last verified

Noometry rank
#49 of 354
Index score
50.3
Evidence
Confirmed 19 results
Provider
Xiaomi
Released
September 21, 2026
Weights
Open weights
Reasoning
Yes
Context window
1.05M
Max output
131K
Input price
$0.43 / M
Output price
$0.87 / M
Blended price
$0.54 / M
Output speed
Not measured
Value
#66 of 219
Knowledge cutoff
Unknown
Input
text, image, audio, video
Hugging Face
XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2.6-Pro-RL

Category scores

Each category score combines every public result we have in that category.

  1. Coding 55.5
  2. Agentic & Tool Use 37.5
  3. Reasoning 43.1
  4. Math 54.5
  5. Knowledge 43.5
  6. Multimodal 40.8
  7. Multilingual 56.9
  8. Instruction Following 78.2
  9. Long Context 46.0
  10. Writing & Preference 66.8
CategoryScoreRankResults
Coding55.5#233
Agentic & Tool Use37.5#351
Reasoning43.1#502
Math54.5#452
Knowledge43.5#921
Multimodal40.8#431
Multilingual56.9#141
Instruction Following78.2#121
Long Context46.0#271
Writing & Preference66.8#333

Strengths and weaknesses

Categories where MiMo-V2.6-Pro places highest and lowest among the models ranked in each, with its score against that category's median.

Strongest categories

CategoryScorevs medianRank
Instruction Following78.2+6.9#12 of 305, top 4%
Multilingual56.9+9.5#14 of 297, top 5%
Coding55.5+16.8#23 of 340, top 7%

Weakest categories

CategoryScorevs medianRank
Multimodal40.8+2.3#43 of 128, top 34%
Knowledge43.5+6.2#92 of 314, top 30%
Agentic & Tool Use37.5+7.2#35 of 154, top 23%

Closest competitors

The models ranked just above and below MiMo-V2.6-Pro. When scores are this close, price and speed are often the better way to choose.

ModelRankScoreBlended $/MSpeed
GPT-5#4550.9$3.442Compare
Muse Spark#4650.6——Compare
Claude Opus 4.5#4750.5$1013Compare
Muse Spark 1.2#4850.3$2—Compare
Claude Sonnet 4.6#5050.3$6—Compare
Muse Spark 1.1#5149.9$2—Compare
Claude Haiku 5.5#5249.5$0.20—Compare
GPT-5.1#5349.0$3.44—Compare

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Benchmark results

Every published result we track, with its source. Bold rows are the ones used for ranking; where several exist we prefer independent runs over self-reported numbers.

Coding

BenchmarkScorePositionSettingSourceDate
LMArena WebDev1629#15 of 113, top 14%LMArena2026-10-08
SciCode60.9%#6 of 121, top 5%Epoch AI
LMArena Coding1534#4 of 294, top 2%LMArena2026-10-08
ALE-Bench1,158#36 of 105, top 35%Epoch AI

Agentic & Tool Use

BenchmarkScorePositionSettingSourceDate
APEX-Agents59.5%#13 of 49, top 27%Epoch AI

Reasoning

BenchmarkScorePositionSettingSourceDate
CritPt26.6%#15 of 134, top 12%Epoch AI
LMArena Hard Prompts1512#6 of 297, top 3%LMArena2026-10-08

Math

BenchmarkScorePositionSettingSourceDate
ProofBench70%#15 of 77, top 20%Epoch AI
LMArena Math1494#15 of 285, top 6%LMArena2026-10-08

Knowledge

BenchmarkScorePositionSettingSourceDate
LMArena Expert1543#5 of 273, top 2%LMArena2026-10-08

Multimodal

BenchmarkScorePositionSettingSourceDate
LMArena Vision1264#42 of 122, top 35%LMArena2026-10-09

Multilingual

BenchmarkScorePositionSettingSourceDate
LMArena Non-English1474#14 of 297, top 5%LMArena2026-10-08
LMArena Chinese1529#18 of 285, top 7%LMArena2026-10-08
LMArena Russian1480#20 of 283, top 8%LMArena2026-10-08

Instruction Following

BenchmarkScorePositionSettingSourceDate
LMArena Instruction Following1493#9 of 298, top 4%LMArena2026-10-08

Long Context

BenchmarkScorePositionSettingSourceDate
LMArena Longer Query1501#9 of 291, top 4%LMArena2026-10-08

Writing & Preference

BenchmarkScorePositionSettingSourceDate
LMArena Text1492#7 of 297, top 3%LMArena2026-10-08
LMArena Creative Writing1468#14 of 295, top 5%LMArena2026-10-08
LMArena Multi-Turn1464#37 of 295, top 13%LMArena2026-10-08

API pricing by provider

RouteInput $/MOutput $/MCached input $/MChecked
deepinfra$0.43$0.87$0.00362026-10-10
openrouter$0.43$0.87$0.00362026-10-10
xiaomi$0.43$0.87$0.00362026-10-10

All Xiaomi API prices → Estimate your cost →

Compare MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Other Xiaomi models

Frequently asked questions

How good is MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi ranks 49th of 354 ranked models on the Noometry Index as of October 2026, with a score of 50.3. Its strongest category is instruction following, where it ranks 12th. API pricing starts at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens, with a 1.05M-token context window.

How much does MiMo-V2.6-Pro cost?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens on Xiaomi's own API, with cached input at $0.0036.

What is MiMo-V2.6-Pro's context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts up to 1.05M tokens of input and can write up to 131K tokens in one response.

Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro open source?

Yes. MiMo-V2.6-Pro's weights are downloadable from Hugging Face (XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2.6-Pro-RL); check the license for commercial terms.

What are MiMo-V2.6-Pro's strengths and weaknesses?

Relative to other ranked models, MiMo-V2.6-Pro places best in instruction following, multilingual, coding and lowest in multimodal, knowledge, agentic & tool use.

What is MiMo-V2.6-Pro best at?

Its best category is instruction following, where it ranks 12th on Noometry.