Model comparison

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.8 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 Tencent

37.2

Rank #193 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

49.8

Rank #44 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.2 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 50.4 to 23.9.

Side by side

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Muse Spark 1.2 specifications
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Muse Spark 1.2
ProviderTencentMeta
Noometry Index37.249.8
Released—2026-08-05
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked1228

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 36.5 (#192), Muse Spark 1.2: 48.6 (#49)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Coding12701497
DeepSWE—54.9%
LMArena WebDev—1532
FrontierSWE—12%
SciCode—56.4%
WeirdML—60.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 29.5 (#77)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Muse Spark 1.2
APEX-Agents—36.4%
GDP.pdf—16%

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 23.9 (#157), Muse Spark 1.2: 50.4 (#32)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Hard Prompts12641490
SimpleBench—74.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—79.2%
CritPt—17.7%
DTBench—94.7%
LMCA—48.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—155.18

Math Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.0 (#179), Muse Spark 1.2: 43.8 (#68)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Muse Spark 1.2
ProofBench—43%
LMArena Math1274—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.6 (#192), Muse Spark 1.2: 53.9 (#49)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Expert12481485
SimpleQA Verified—60.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 42.6 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision—1304

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.9 (#198), Muse Spark 1.2: 57.4 (#10)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Non-English12621479
LMArena Chinese13191519
LMArena Russian12581494

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.8 (#214), Muse Spark 1.2: 77.1 (#30)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Instruction Following12451466

Long Context Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#168), Muse Spark 1.2: 45.4 (#35)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Longer Query13011483

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.4 (#209), Muse Spark 1.2: 72.6 (#14)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text12741486
LMArena Creative Writing12421444
LMArena Multi-Turn12751504
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1840

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.8 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 36.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Muse Spark 1.2 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper