Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Google

37.8

Rank #194 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 43.1 to 22.0.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2.6-Pro specifications
Gemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderGoogleXiaomi
Noometry Index37.850.3
Released2025-02-052026-09-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.43
Output $ / M tokens—$0.87
Results tracked3219

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Coding13221534
LMArena WebDev—1629
SciCode—60.9%
LiveBench Coding47.1%—
ALE-Bench—1,158

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2.6-Pro
APEX-Agents—59.5%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts13241512
CritPt—26.6%
LiveBench Reasoning50.1%—
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis65.5%—
ForecastBench57.1—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Math13091494
ProofBench—70%
Omni-MATH37.4%—
LiveBench Math58.1%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Expert13051543
MMLU-Pro72%—
GPQA (HELM)50%—

Multimodal MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision11001264

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Non-English13231474
LMArena Chinese13391529
LMArena Russian13281480
LMArena French1347—
LMArena German1306—
LMArena Japanese1301—
LMArena Korean1325—
LMArena Spanish1313—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following13051493
LiveBench Instruction Following78.3%—
IFEval82.4%—

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Longer Query13201501

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text13301492
LMArena Creative Writing13191468
LMArena Multi-Turn13071464
WildBench79%—
LiveBench Language34.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper