Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 35.8 to 9.3.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 38.6 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1307 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1286 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |
Math Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1281 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1276 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1346 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1266 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1277 |
Long Context Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1341 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1288 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1284 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.2 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.