Model comparison
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Llama 4 Scout
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.0 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 4 Scout in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 37.6 to 19.9.
- Llama 4 Scout has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 4 Scout | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 38.0 | 27.4 |
| Released | — | 2025-04-05 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 43 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177), Llama 4 Scout: 19.9 (#334)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1307 | 1286 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9.1% |
| SciCode | — | 17% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 43.1% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, Llama 4 Scout: 24.4 (#109)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.1% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147), Llama 4 Scout: 9.2 (#339)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1286 | 1266 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 36.9% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 0.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| DTBench | — | 57.9% |
| LMCA | — | 12% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 129.64 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.5 |
Math Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178), Llama 4 Scout: 18.4 (#280)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1281 | 1286 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.8% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 37.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 62.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188), Llama 4 Scout: 31.8 (#208)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1276 | 1236 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 51.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 74.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 50.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, Llama 4 Scout: 31.6 (#98)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1118 |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 34.2% |
Multilingual Too close to call
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195), Llama 4 Scout: 41.3 (#207)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | 1253 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1346 | 1256 |
| LMArena Russian | 1266 | 1263 |
| LMArena French | — | 1283 |
| LMArena German | — | 1274 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1209 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1277 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192), Llama 4 Scout: 66.0 (#212)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1277 | 1248 |
| IFEval | — | 81.8% |
Long Context Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144), Llama 4 Scout: 27.5 (#289)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1342 | 1265 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 36% |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191), Llama 4 Scout: 37.1 (#256)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1288 | 1279 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | 1249 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1284 | 1281 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 783 |
| WildBench | — | 78% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Llama 4 Scout?
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.0 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Llama 4 Scout better for coding?
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 19.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Llama 4 Scout share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Llama 4 Scout has 43.