Model comparison

Grok-3 mini vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Grok-3 mini xAI

41.2

Rank #141 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-3 mini scores higher in 2 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 43.1 to 13.6.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok-3 mini and MiMo-V2.6-Pro specifications
Grok-3 miniMiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderxAIXiaomi
Noometry Index41.250.3
Released2025-04-092026-09-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.43
Output $ / M tokens—$0.87
Results tracked3519

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Grok-3 mini: 40.8 (#131), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Coding13791534
Aider Polyglot49.3%—
LMArena WebDev—1629
SciCode—60.9%
WeirdML42.6%—
ALE-Bench—1,158

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok-3 mini: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMiMo-V2.6-Pro
APEX-Agents—59.5%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Grok-3 mini: 13.6 (#334), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts13751512
ARC-AGI-20.4%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%—
ARC-AGI-116.5%—
CritPt—26.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index140.35—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Grok-3 mini: 42.1 (#85), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Math13861494
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202577.8%—
ProofBench—70%
Omni-MATH31.8%—
MATH Level 590.9%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)5.9%—

Knowledge Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 46.4 (#81), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Expert13951543
GPQA Diamond76.3%—
MMLU-Pro79.9%—
Confabulations10.8%—
GPQA (HELM)67.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok-3 mini: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision—1264

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Grok-3 mini: 48.1 (#145), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Non-English13521474
LMArena Chinese13871529
LMArena Russian13531480
LMArena French1357—
LMArena German1349—
LMArena Japanese1342—
LMArena Korean1335—
LMArena Spanish1381—

Instruction Following Too close to call

Grok-3 mini: 78.5 (#9), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following13571493
IFEval95.1%—

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#147), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Longer Query13721501
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%—

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Grok-3 mini: 52.5 (#169), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text13701492
LMArena Creative Writing13421468
LMArena Multi-Turn13551464
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
WildBench65.1%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-3 mini better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok-3 mini or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 40.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok-3 mini and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-3 mini has 35 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper