Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 54.5 to 37.5.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 50.3 |
| Released | — | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1534 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1629 |
| SciCode | — | 60.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1512 |
| CritPt | — | 26.6% |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | 1494 |
| ProofBench | — | 70% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1543 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1363 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | 1368 | 1480 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1351 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1344 | 1493 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | 1501 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1359 | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1387 | 1464 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.