Model comparison

gpt-oss-20b vs phi-3-medium 14B

gpt-oss-20b is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

gpt-oss-20b OpenAI

32.5

Rank #255 Confirmed

phi-3-medium 14B Microsoft

29.7

Rank #306 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. gpt-oss-20b scores higher in 3 categories and phi-3-medium 14B in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where gpt-oss-20b leads 34.6 to 9.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 60.8% for gpt-oss-20b and 27.6% for phi-3-medium 14B.

Side by side

gpt-oss-20b and phi-3-medium 14B specifications
gpt-oss-20bphi-3-medium 14B
ProviderOpenAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index32.529.7
Released2025-08-052024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.018—
Output $ / M tokens$0.09—
Results tracked3413

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

gpt-oss-20b: 37.6 (#192), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bphi-3-medium 14B
SciCode34.4%—
WeirdML40.9%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—37.6%
LMArena Coding1306—
BigCodeBench Complete—48.7%
ALE-Bench566.05—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

gpt-oss-20b: 9.3 (#154), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bphi-3-medium 14B
Terminal-Bench3.4%—

Reasoning Not comparable

gpt-oss-20b: 19.3 (#261), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bphi-3-medium 14B
Epoch Capabilities Index137.82121.23
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.2%—
CritPt1.4%—
Chess Puzzles4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1274—
DTBench68%—
LMCA14.5%—
Adversarial NLI—55.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—81.4%
HellaSwag—82.4%
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math gpt-oss-20b leads

gpt-oss-20b: 39.4 (#103), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)

Math benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bphi-3-medium 14B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202565.3%—
Omni-MATH56.5%—
LMArena Math1317—
MATH Level 5—17.6%

Knowledge gpt-oss-20b leads

gpt-oss-20b: 34.6 (#195), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bphi-3-medium 14B
GPQA Diamond60.8%27.6%
MMLU-Pro74%—
GPQA (HELM)59.4%—
LMArena Expert1258—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—91.6%
MMLU—78%
OpenBookQA—87.4%
TriviaQA—73.9%

Multilingual Not comparable

gpt-oss-20b: 42.2 (#197), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Non-English1268—
LMArena Chinese1314—
LMArena German1255—
LMArena Japanese1244—
LMArena Korean1236—
LMArena Russian1278—
LMArena Spanish1267—

Instruction Following Not comparable

gpt-oss-20b: 61.8 (#240), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bphi-3-medium 14B
IFEval73.2%—
LMArena Instruction Following1236—

Long Context Not comparable

gpt-oss-20b: 37.9 (#209), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Longer Query1250—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

gpt-oss-20b: 35.5 (#265), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Text1287—
LMArena Creative Writing1201—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing666—
WildBench73.7%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1268—

Frequently asked questions

Is gpt-oss-20b better than phi-3-medium 14B?

gpt-oss-20b is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is gpt-oss-20b or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (37.6 vs 36.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do gpt-oss-20b and phi-3-medium 14B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. gpt-oss-20b has 34 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper