Model comparison

gpt-oss-20b vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B

gpt-oss-20b is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

gpt-oss-20b OpenAI

32.5

Rank #255 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. gpt-oss-20b scores higher in 5 categories and OLMo 2 Furious 13B in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where gpt-oss-20b leads 39.4 to 23.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MMLU-Pro: 74% for gpt-oss-20b and 31% for OLMo 2 Furious 13B.

Side by side

gpt-oss-20b and OLMo 2 Furious 13B specifications
gpt-oss-20bOLMo 2 Furious 13B
ProviderOpenAIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index32.529.7
Released2025-08-052024-12-31
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.018—
Output $ / M tokens$0.09—
Results tracked3412

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding gpt-oss-20b leads

gpt-oss-20b: 37.6 (#192), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bOLMo 2 Furious 13B
SciCode34.4%—
WeirdML40.9%—
LiveBench Coding—10.4%
LMArena Coding1306—
ALE-Bench566.05—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

gpt-oss-20b: 9.3 (#154), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bOLMo 2 Furious 13B
Terminal-Bench3.4%—

Reasoning gpt-oss-20b leads

gpt-oss-20b: 19.3 (#261), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bOLMo 2 Furious 13B
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.2%—
CritPt1.4%—
Chess Puzzles4%—
LiveBench Reasoning—16.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1274—
DTBench68%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—20.6%
LMCA14.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index137.82—
LiveBench—22.1%

Math gpt-oss-20b leads

gpt-oss-20b: 39.4 (#103), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)

Math benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bOLMo 2 Furious 13B
Omni-MATH56.5%15.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202565.3%—
LiveBench Math—13.6%
LMArena Math1317—

Knowledge gpt-oss-20b leads

gpt-oss-20b: 34.6 (#195), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bOLMo 2 Furious 13B
MMLU-Pro74%31%
GPQA (HELM)59.4%31.6%
GPQA Diamond60.8%—
LMArena Expert1258—

Multilingual Not comparable

gpt-oss-20b: 42.2 (#197), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Non-English1268—
LMArena Chinese1314—
LMArena German1255—
LMArena Japanese1244—
LMArena Korean1236—
LMArena Russian1278—
LMArena Spanish1267—

Instruction Following Too close to call

gpt-oss-20b: 61.8 (#240), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bOLMo 2 Furious 13B
IFEval73.2%73%
LiveBench Instruction Following—60.6%
LMArena Instruction Following1236—

Long Context Not comparable

gpt-oss-20b: 37.9 (#209), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Longer Query1250—

Writing & Preference OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads

gpt-oss-20b: 35.5 (#265), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bOLMo 2 Furious 13B
WildBench73.7%68.9%
LMArena Text1287—
LMArena Creative Writing1201—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing666—
LMArena Multi-Turn1268—
LiveBench Language—11.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is gpt-oss-20b better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?

gpt-oss-20b is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is gpt-oss-20b or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?

gpt-oss-20b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do gpt-oss-20b and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. gpt-oss-20b has 34 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper