Model comparison

gpt-oss-20b vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

gpt-oss-20b is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

gpt-oss-20b OpenAI

32.5

Rank #255 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.7

Rank #305 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. gpt-oss-20b scores higher in 7 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where gpt-oss-20b leads 42.2 to 25.2.

Side by side

gpt-oss-20b and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
gpt-oss-20bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderOpenAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index32.529.7
Released2025-08-052024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.018—
Output $ / M tokens$0.09—
Results tracked3419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding gpt-oss-20b leads

gpt-oss-20b: 37.6 (#192), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Coding13061039
SciCode34.4%—
WeirdML40.9%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.6%
ALE-Bench566.05—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

gpt-oss-20b: 9.3 (#154), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
Terminal-Bench3.4%—

Reasoning Too close to call

gpt-oss-20b: 19.3 (#261), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12741028
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.2%—
CritPt1.4%—
Chess Puzzles4%—
DTBench68%—
LMCA14.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index137.82—

Math gpt-oss-20b leads

gpt-oss-20b: 39.4 (#103), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

Math benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math13171089
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202565.3%—
Omni-MATH56.5%—

Knowledge gpt-oss-20b leads

gpt-oss-20b: 34.6 (#195), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Expert1258984
GPQA Diamond60.8%—
MMLU-Pro74%—
GPQA (HELM)59.4%—

Multilingual gpt-oss-20b leads

gpt-oss-20b: 42.2 (#197), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English12681000
LMArena Chinese13141016
LMArena German12551006
LMArena Japanese1244899
LMArena Korean1236856
LMArena Russian12781004
LMArena Spanish12671059
LMArena French—1039

Instruction Following gpt-oss-20b leads

gpt-oss-20b: 61.8 (#240), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12361023
IFEval73.2%—

Long Context gpt-oss-20b leads

gpt-oss-20b: 37.9 (#209), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1250996

Writing & Preference gpt-oss-20b leads

gpt-oss-20b: 35.5 (#265), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text12871050
LMArena Creative Writing12011024
LMArena Multi-Turn1268989
EQ-Bench Creative Writing666—
WildBench73.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is gpt-oss-20b better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

gpt-oss-20b is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is gpt-oss-20b or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

gpt-oss-20b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do gpt-oss-20b and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. gpt-oss-20b has 34 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper