Model comparison
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs phi-3-medium 14B
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 19.5 to 9.1.
Side by side
| Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 32.7 | 29.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding phi-3-medium 14B leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1210 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1208 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.23 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math Too close to call
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 16.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1208 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | 41.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 28.7% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1160 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1192 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 78% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1186 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1194 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1199 | — |
| WildBench | 73.4% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1221 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than phi-3-medium 14B?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?
phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.8 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and phi-3-medium 14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.