Model comparison

Gemma 2 9B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2 9B Google

25.9

Rank #341 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 54.5 to 9.9.

Side by side

Gemma 2 9B and MiMo-V2.6-Pro specifications
Gemma 2 9BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderGoogleXiaomi
Noometry Index25.950.3
Released2024-06-242026-09-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.43
Output $ / M tokens—$0.87
Results tracked3519

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Gemma 2 9B: 29.4 (#304), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Coding11731534
LMArena WebDev—1629
SciCode—60.9%
BigCodeBench Instruct34.7%—
LiveBench Coding22.5%—
BigCodeBench Complete40.6%—
ALE-Bench—1,158

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 2 9B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
APEX-Agents—59.5%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Gemma 2 9B: 15.9 (#309), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts11711512
CritPt—26.6%
LiveBench Reasoning15.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis36.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.83—
LiveBench28.7%—
PIQA83.7%—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Gemma 2 9B: 9.9 (#318), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Math11831494
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.6%—
ProofBench—70%
LiveBench Math19.8%—
MATH Level 521%—
GSM8K84.9%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#305), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Expert11471543
GPQA Diamond27.5%—
BoolQ85.7%—
MMLU72.1%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 2 9B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision—1264

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Gemma 2 9B: 36.6 (#238), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Non-English11881474
LMArena Chinese11851529
LMArena Russian12001480
LMArena French1190—
LMArena German1186—
LMArena Japanese1144—
LMArena Korean1137—
LMArena Spanish1200—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Gemma 2 9B: 57.6 (#269), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following11781493
LiveBench Instruction Following52.6%—

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#233), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Longer Query11971501

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Gemma 2 9B: 32.1 (#281), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text12071492
LMArena Creative Writing12061468
LMArena Multi-Turn11931464
EQ-Bench Creative Writing841—
LiveBench Language25.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2 9B better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 2 9B or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper